How to beat Mono-Blue Delver in Pauper

Over the last 90 days of recorded Pauper matches, the decks with the best results against Mono-Blue Delver are Golgari Gardens (86% over 7 matches). Golgari Gardens's 86% sits in a 95% range of 49%–97%, which is the range a 7-match sample actually supports. The decks with the best records against it most often carry Weather the Storm, Troublemaker Ouphe and Duress in the sideboard — those are their sideboards in general, not cards chosen for this matchup.

Best records against Mono-Blue Delver

Matches played in the last 90 days, from events that publish round-by-round pairings. Ranked by the bottom of each 95% range, not by the headline percentage, so a small sample cannot outrank a large one.

Archetypes with the best recorded results against Mono-Blue Delver, best first
DeckWin rate vs Mono-Blue DelverRecordMatchesSample95% range
Golgari Gardens85.7%6-17Low sample49%–97%
  • High sample · 20+ matches
  • Medium sample · 8–19 matches
  • Low sample · 5–7 matches

23 further pairings (46 matches) fall below the 5-match floor and are not given a percentage. Full history, retired archetypes included, is on Mono-Blue Delver's archetype page and in the Pauper matchup matrix.

What the decks that beat Mono-Blue Delver bring

Sideboard cards run by Golgari Gardens. This is not a sideboard guide for this matchup. We record who beat whom, not what either player boarded, so these are whole-sideboard frequencies across every matchup those decks play — a hint about the kind of card that punishes Mono-Blue Delver, not a list to bring in.

CardDecks running itAverage copiesWhich decks
Weather the Storm1 of 13.9Golgari Gardens
Troublemaker Ouphe1 of 13.1Golgari Gardens
Duress1 of 12.6Golgari Gardens
Faerie Macabre1 of 11.5Golgari Gardens
Rancid Earth1 of 11.4Golgari Gardens
Drown in Sorrow1 of 11.4Golgari Gardens
Avenging Hunter1 of 10.5Golgari Gardens

Average copies is expected copies per deck — average copies played multiplied by the share of that archetype's lists running the card — so a 4-of in half the lists reads as 2.0.

Decks Mono-Blue Delver beats

The other end of the same table. If you are choosing a deck to attack Mono-Blue Delver with, the record argues against these.

Archetypes Mono-Blue Delver has the best recorded results against, worst first for the challenger
DeckWin rate vs Mono-Blue DelverRecordMatchesSample95% range
Mono Red Madness22.2%4-1418Medium sample9%–45%
Ephemerate Tron20.0%1-45Low sample4%–62%
Jund Wildfire33.3%3-69Medium sample12%–65%
Grixis Affinity45.5%5-611Medium sample21%–72%
  • High sample · 20+ matches
  • Medium sample · 8–19 matches
  • Low sample · 5–7 matches

Questions

What beats Mono-Blue Delver in Pauper?

Across the last 90 days, Golgari Gardens (86% over 7 matches) hold the best recorded results against Mono-Blue Delver. Records come from events that publish round-by-round pairings, and both decks in a match have to be identified for it to count, so these are the pairings we can see rather than every match played.

What should I bring in against Mono-Blue Delver?

We do not have sideboard choices tied to individual matches, so this is not a sideboard guide. What the data supports is narrower: the 1 deck with the best records against Mono-Blue Delver — Golgari Gardens — most commonly run Weather the Storm, Troublemaker Ouphe, Duress, Faerie Macabre and Rancid Earth in their sideboards. Those are whole-sideboard frequencies across every matchup those decks play.

What does Mono-Blue Delver beat?

Mono-Blue Delver's best recorded matchups over the same window are Mono Red Madness (78% across 18 matches), Ephemerate Tron (80% across 5 matches) and Jund Wildfire (67% across 9 matches). If you are picking a deck to attack Mono-Blue Delver with, these are the ones the record argues against.

How reliable are these Pauper matchup numbers?

Not very, and the page says so per row rather than in aggregate. Every pairing shows its match count, its sample band and a 95% range; the strongest band we award is 20+ matches, which is still roughly a ±20-point range around the figure shown. Pairings under 5 matches are counted but never given a percentage — there are 23 of those for Mono-Blue Delver right now. Rankings use the bottom of each range rather than the headline percentage, so a small sample cannot outrank a large one it has not earned.

What period does this cover?

Matches played in the last 90 days, filtered on when each match was actually played. Archetypes that have dropped out of the Pauper metagame are excluded from the ranking — their historical records are still on Mono-Blue Delver's own archetype page and in the format matchup matrix.

What each number on this site measures, and where it is least reliable, is set out on the methodology page.