How to beat Mono Red Madness in Pauper
Over the last 90 days of recorded Pauper matches, the decks with the best results against Mono Red Madness are Golgari Gardens (90% over 10 matches), Mono-Blue Delver (78% over 18 matches) and Mono Red Rally (73% over 15 matches). Golgari Gardens's 90% sits in a 95% range of 60%–98%, which is the range a 10-match sample actually supports. The decks with the best records against it most often carry Blue Elemental Blast, Hydroblast and Envelop in the sideboard — those are their sideboards in general, not cards chosen for this matchup.
Best records against Mono Red Madness
Matches played in the last 90 days, from events that publish round-by-round pairings. Ranked by the bottom of each 95% range, not by the headline percentage, so a small sample cannot outrank a large one.
| Deck | Win rate vs Mono Red Madness | Record | Matches | Sample | 95% range |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Golgari Gardens | 90.0% | 9-1 | 10 | Medium sample | 60%–98% |
| Mono-Blue Delver | 77.8% | 14-4 | 18 | Medium sample | 55%–91% |
| Mono Red Rally | 73.3% | 11-4 | 15 | Medium sample | 48%–89% |
| Grixis Affinity | 57.1% | 20-15 | 35 | High sample | 41%–72% |
| Mono-Blue Faeries | 56.5% | 13-10 | 23 | High sample | 37%–74% |
| Jeskai Ephemerate | 71.4% | 5-2 | 7 | Low sample | 36%–92% |
| Ephemerate Tron | 53.6% | 15-13 | 28 | High sample | 36%–70% |
| Bogles | 60.0% | 6-4 | 10 | Medium sample | 31%–83% |
| Ruby Storm | 66.7% | 4-2 | 6 | Low sample | 30%–90% |
| Tron | 66.7% | 4-2 | 6 | Low sample | 30%–90% |
| Esper Affinity | 55.6% | 5-4 | 9 | Medium sample | 27%–81% |
| Snacker Gates | 57.1% | 4-3 | 7 | Low sample | 25%–84% |
| Familiars | 60.0% | 3-2 | 5 | Low sample | 23%–88% |
| Mardu Synthesizer | 60.0% | 3-2 | 5 | Low sample | 23%–88% |
- High sample · 20+ matches
- Medium sample · 8–19 matches
- Low sample · 5–7 matches
24 further pairings (62 matches) fall below the 5-match floor and are not given a percentage. 3 pairings against archetypes that have left the Pauper metagame are excluded. Full history, retired archetypes included, is on Mono Red Madness's archetype page and in the Pauper matchup matrix.
What the decks that beat Mono Red Madness bring
Sideboard cards run by Golgari Gardens, Mono-Blue Delver, Mono Red Rally, Grixis Affinity, Mono-Blue Faeries. This is not a sideboard guide for this matchup. We record who beat whom, not what either player boarded, so these are whole-sideboard frequencies across every matchup those decks play — a hint about the kind of card that punishes Mono Red Madness, not a list to bring in.
| Card | Decks running it | Average copies | Which decks |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blue Elemental Blast | 3 of 5 | 2.1 | Mono-Blue Delver, Grixis Affinity, Mono-Blue Faeries |
| Hydroblast | 3 of 5 | 2.0 | Mono-Blue Delver, Grixis Affinity, Mono-Blue Faeries |
| Envelop | 3 of 5 | 0.7 | Mono-Blue Delver, Grixis Affinity, Mono-Blue Faeries |
| Pyroblast | 2 of 5 | 2.3 | Mono Red Rally, Grixis Affinity |
| Steel Sabotage | 2 of 5 | 2.3 | Mono-Blue Delver, Mono-Blue Faeries |
| Dispel | 2 of 5 | 1.9 | Mono-Blue Delver, Mono-Blue Faeries |
| Annul | 2 of 5 | 1.8 | Mono-Blue Delver, Mono-Blue Faeries |
| Red Elemental Blast | 2 of 5 | 1.6 | Mono Red Rally, Grixis Affinity |
| Relic of Progenitus | 2 of 5 | 1.6 | Mono Red Rally, Mono-Blue Faeries |
| Weather the Storm | 1 of 5 | 3.9 | Golgari Gardens |
| Troublemaker Ouphe | 1 of 5 | 3.1 | Golgari Gardens |
| Gut Shot | 1 of 5 | 3.0 | Mono-Blue Delver |
Average copies is expected copies per deck — average copies played multiplied by the share of that archetype's lists running the card — so a 4-of in half the lists reads as 2.0.
Decks Mono Red Madness beats
The other end of the same table. If you are choosing a deck to attack Mono Red Madness with, the record argues against these.
| Deck | Win rate vs Mono Red Madness | Record | Matches | Sample | 95% range |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Spy Combo | 5.6% | 1-17 | 18 | Medium sample | 1%–26% |
| Elves | 25.0% | 8-24 | 32 | High sample | 13%–42% |
| Jund Wildfire | 26.7% | 4-11 | 15 | Medium sample | 11%–52% |
| White Aggro | 33.3% | 3-6 | 9 | Medium sample | 12%–65% |
| Food Gardens | 33.3% | 2-4 | 6 | Low sample | 10%–70% |
| Gruul Ponza | 45.5% | 5-6 | 11 | Medium sample | 21%–72% |
| Blue Terror | 40.0% | 2-3 | 5 | Low sample | 12%–77% |
| Grixis Faeries | 40.0% | 2-3 | 5 | Low sample | 12%–77% |
- High sample · 20+ matches
- Medium sample · 8–19 matches
- Low sample · 5–7 matches
Questions
What beats Mono Red Madness in Pauper?
Across the last 90 days, Golgari Gardens (90% over 10 matches), Mono-Blue Delver (78% over 18 matches) and Mono Red Rally (73% over 15 matches) hold the best recorded results against Mono Red Madness. Records come from events that publish round-by-round pairings, and both decks in a match have to be identified for it to count, so these are the pairings we can see rather than every match played.
What should I bring in against Mono Red Madness?
We do not have sideboard choices tied to individual matches, so this is not a sideboard guide. What the data supports is narrower: the 5 decks with the best records against Mono Red Madness — Golgari Gardens, Mono-Blue Delver, Mono Red Rally, Grixis Affinity and Mono-Blue Faeries — most commonly run Blue Elemental Blast, Hydroblast, Envelop, Pyroblast and Steel Sabotage in their sideboards. Those are whole-sideboard frequencies across every matchup those decks play.
What does Mono Red Madness beat?
Mono Red Madness's best recorded matchups over the same window are Spy Combo (94% across 18 matches), Elves (75% across 32 matches) and Jund Wildfire (73% across 15 matches). If you are picking a deck to attack Mono Red Madness with, these are the ones the record argues against.
How reliable are these Pauper matchup numbers?
Not very, and the page says so per row rather than in aggregate. Every pairing shows its match count, its sample band and a 95% range; the strongest band we award is 20+ matches, which is still roughly a ±20-point range around the figure shown. Pairings under 5 matches are counted but never given a percentage — there are 24 of those for Mono Red Madness right now. Rankings use the bottom of each range rather than the headline percentage, so a small sample cannot outrank a large one it has not earned.
What period does this cover?
Matches played in the last 90 days, filtered on when each match was actually played. Archetypes that have dropped out of the Pauper metagame are excluded from the ranking, which removes 3 pairings here — their historical records are still on Mono Red Madness's own archetype page and in the format matchup matrix.
What each number on this site measures, and where it is least reliable, is set out on the methodology page.