How to beat Mono-Green Landfall in Standard

Over the last 90 days of recorded Standard matches, the decks with the best results against Mono-Green Landfall are Izzet Spellementals (64% over 25 matches) and Selesnya Landfall (67% over 6 matches). Izzet Spellementals's 64% sits in a 95% range of 45%–80%, which is the range a 25-match sample actually supports. The decks with the best records against it most often carry Erode, Colorstorm Stallion and Clarion Conqueror in the sideboard — those are their sideboards in general, not cards chosen for this matchup.

Best records against Mono-Green Landfall

Matches played in the last 90 days, from events that publish round-by-round pairings. Ranked by the bottom of each 95% range, not by the headline percentage, so a small sample cannot outrank a large one.

Archetypes with the best recorded results against Mono-Green Landfall, best first
DeckWin rate vs Mono-Green LandfallRecordMatchesSample95% range
Izzet Spellementals64.0%16-925High sample45%–80%
Selesnya Landfall66.7%4-26Low sample30%–90%
  • High sample · 20+ matches
  • Medium sample · 8–19 matches
  • Low sample · 5–7 matches

22 further pairings (45 matches) fall below the 5-match floor and are not given a percentage. Full history, retired archetypes included, is on Mono-Green Landfall's archetype page and in the Standard matchup matrix.

What the decks that beat Mono-Green Landfall bring

Sideboard cards run by Izzet Spellementals, Selesnya Landfall. This is not a sideboard guide for this matchup. We record who beat whom, not what either player boarded, so these are whole-sideboard frequencies across every matchup those decks play — a hint about the kind of card that punishes Mono-Green Landfall, not a list to bring in.

CardDecks running itAverage copiesWhich decks
Erode1 of 23.0Selesnya Landfall
Colorstorm Stallion1 of 22.9Izzet Spellementals
Clarion Conqueror1 of 22.8Selesnya Landfall
Torpor Orb1 of 22.5Selesnya Landfall
Surrak, Elusive Hunter1 of 22.5Selesnya Landfall
Sheltered by Ghosts1 of 22.1Selesnya Landfall
Sapling Nursery1 of 21.5Selesnya Landfall
Disdainful Stroke1 of 21.2Izzet Spellementals
Broadside Barrage1 of 21.1Izzet Spellementals
Sunspine Lynx1 of 21.0Izzet Spellementals
Rest in Peace1 of 21.0Selesnya Landfall
Flashfreeze1 of 21.0Izzet Spellementals

Average copies is expected copies per deck — average copies played multiplied by the share of that archetype's lists running the card — so a 4-of in half the lists reads as 2.0.

Decks Mono-Green Landfall beats

The other end of the same table. If you are choosing a deck to attack Mono-Green Landfall with, the record argues against these.

Archetypes Mono-Green Landfall has the best recorded results against, worst first for the challenger
DeckWin rate vs Mono-Green LandfallRecordMatchesSample95% range
Dimir Midrange41.2%7-1017Medium sample22%–64%
  • High sample · 20+ matches
  • Medium sample · 8–19 matches
  • Low sample · 5–7 matches

Questions

What beats Mono-Green Landfall in Standard?

Across the last 90 days, Izzet Spellementals (64% over 25 matches) and Selesnya Landfall (67% over 6 matches) hold the best recorded results against Mono-Green Landfall. Records come from events that publish round-by-round pairings, and both decks in a match have to be identified for it to count, so these are the pairings we can see rather than every match played.

What should I bring in against Mono-Green Landfall?

We do not have sideboard choices tied to individual matches, so this is not a sideboard guide. What the data supports is narrower: the 2 decks with the best records against Mono-Green Landfall — Izzet Spellementals and Selesnya Landfall — most commonly run Erode, Colorstorm Stallion, Clarion Conqueror, Torpor Orb and Surrak, Elusive Hunter in their sideboards. Those are whole-sideboard frequencies across every matchup those decks play.

What does Mono-Green Landfall beat?

Mono-Green Landfall's best recorded matchups over the same window are Dimir Midrange (59% across 17 matches). If you are picking a deck to attack Mono-Green Landfall with, these are the ones the record argues against.

How reliable are these Standard matchup numbers?

Not very, and the page says so per row rather than in aggregate. Every pairing shows its match count, its sample band and a 95% range; the strongest band we award is 20+ matches, which is still roughly a ±20-point range around the figure shown. Pairings under 5 matches are counted but never given a percentage — there are 22 of those for Mono-Green Landfall right now. Rankings use the bottom of each range rather than the headline percentage, so a small sample cannot outrank a large one it has not earned.

What period does this cover?

Matches played in the last 90 days, filtered on when each match was actually played. Archetypes that have dropped out of the Standard metagame are excluded from the ranking — their historical records are still on Mono-Green Landfall's own archetype page and in the format matchup matrix.

What each number on this site measures, and where it is least reliable, is set out on the methodology page.